Last night I had a very positive experience with the use of collaborative technology in an online meeting with fellow master students. We used Skype for voice-conference and Etherpad for collaborative notetaking in real time. It was a two hour long meeting and we were 5 participants.

Everyone expressed positive feelings about the use of communication tools as the technology did not come in the way for the discussion, which was led by a conference leader and who also took minutes. The benefits of such an arrangement were summed up at the end of the session:

  • intense and condensed discussion as everyone was focused on the message
  • easy to follow the discussion as there was notes taken during the discussion
  • editable and searchable document as well as portable afterwards
  • clear agenda is a must for such a session

I’m trying to circle in a possible hypothesis for my master, and I might look at collaborative writing tools such as Etherpad or Google Docs in relation to peer reviews in language teaching.

This entry was posted in Digital Literacy and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>